Friday, October 30, 2009

Conclusion for my theories (not for the blog)

To read before :

http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/08/heisenberg-and-god.html


In order to conclude it is good to notice that the theory as an intellectual construction which for a part is not depending on some experiences and/or experiments makes look at the world in a different manner and thus motivates to develop some physical inventions which make evolve our way of life, by assuring us a power suitable for bringing us the peace as much as our theories are the best ones; according to what it is obviously better to search because it is not by waiting that some new ideas come to confront our five senses that we will be protected; it is better to go methodically so intelligently, and if possible without going too far from the common way of thinking, to the research of these ideas, which at the beginning will catalyze at least our interpretation; thus we can remark that the theory according to which the Sun is the center of our planetary system had been seriously considered by the mind of Aristarchus of Samos and even more certainly by the one of Copernicus, before the telescope could bring enough sensual proofs to the rest of the world by the intermediate of Galileo Galilei, according to what the sensual proof is not indispensable to the reality, even if it confirms this reality and that it is better not to take too much risks. The error remains true for the human thought but at least the ones that we have realized become as much marks in order to show us the way of the truth. Also in order to judge a work it is better to know it totally, after it is better to know how to make allowances and not to condemn the totality while only a part is wrong [1], what discourages to do any hypothesis, nevertheless it is mainly like this that the humanity is evolving, from this possibility to progress blindly toward the divine truths. Obviously this submits us to error, but it is better to do some and to progress than not to do any and to remain farther from God, whereas we want to know It the most possible, as is confirming the worships which have been developed in the different civilizations and as well tribes; on the top of that to include this infinite consideration in our projects clings us stronger to life, and reinforces even our familial and social projects, because to have the ambition to know what is not finishing and is reinforcing us always, motivates us to progress directly or out of the intermediate of some others more qualified in order to discover things, and to whom it is better to give the opportunity to think in the best conditions possible.

[1] Update 04/08/2011: For the scientific part of my work, what is present should be enough for the time being, and until now the corrections are the effect of my own judgment, my work did then resist critics.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Article 10

Water stems from the equilibrium of the energetic potential of stars which forms the different atoms and molecules, and in a usual way we can remark its gaseous condensable release during some combustions and mainly the one stemmed from volcanoes. Also if we can observe its presence on the Earth it is due to the atmosphere, and to the gravity and the inertia which are in it and which retain water; thus it is possible to find it in three different forms which are vapor (clouds…), liquid (rains, lacks, rivers, seas…), and ice (snow, hail, ice-floe…). About the liquid streams they have in part the same causes than winds applied to the liquid element and can be influenced by them, also tidal waves stem from volcanic activities and from the displacements of plates, where there is some thermal phenomenons but as well wave ones(1); and the variations of relief have to be considered for the fluvial flows.
Otherwise we can think that the motion in tides should come from an interaction between the terrestrial sky and the one of the Moon, as a result of what for a first hypothesis we could pose (within the framework of the hypothesis of Descartes about this subject (see The World))…

The rest of this article has been rectified and will be published only when I will be sure to be remunerated for my work (done and to come), because I would not like to make forget the value of this kind of thing by being too much generous; also I do not want to be abused.


(1): Also some enough powerful hurricanes can be accompanied by a groundswell of a considerable height.




Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Article 9 last part

But there is something left to explain in order this should be really logical, because at a same altitude in the closest layer to the soil the gravity is increasing by going from the equator toward the North Pole, although this is not the same thing by going toward the South Pole (there are more irregularities); as well it can seem strange that the gravity decreases when the altitude increases in this same layer, while the heaviest gases, as the CO2, which are then the closest to the soil have a greater capacity to carry as the liquid water compared with air, what should propose the opposite phenomenon (if we refer to the conditions of the experiment of von Jolly). Thus a new factor should be considered which is the composition of the soil, and here we can consider a black matter having an attractive power, which is magnetite or the mineral magnet, and which as its name indicates forms a magnetic field(1) by creating a flow with the particles of the two first secondary elements and especially the smallest ones; also the flow that they should form in this case should be quite weak what is proved by compasses, and should not create appreciably any warmth because especially the small particles of the second secondary element should participate in it(2), but it should increase all the same the quantity of the particles serving to the gravity in the geographical areas where should be found some magnetite with a higher concentration, by considering that it is possible to find a little of it everywhere in the crust(3); what should explain its variations at the level of the soil.
Besides this system of gravity should be propitious to explain the phenomenon of Northern Lights, because when the concentration of the particles of the first secondary element should be high enough(2), it should be normal that some luminous phenomenons should be produced; what should happen more easily near the magnetic North Pole for the reason that these particles should be more concentrated because of the magnetic field (more magnetite which orientates the magnetic field in some other places)(1).

(1): As well the motion under the terrestrial crust of the mass in fusion could produce a current being able to participate in the magnetic field (see theory of the dynamo effect). \ (2): See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/article-2.html \ (3): Considering that there is always a possible production of magnetite under the crust.


Update 13/04/2011: Otherwise about the particles as those of a magnetic field in the process of gravity, it is possible to consult the case of the mouse in magnetic levitation with a study of the NASA in relation with gravity (or of the frog by A. Geim (Nobel prize laureate) et M. Berry), here the magnetic field is enough higher than the radiation of the Earth (which is not local), but as well than the gravity, what gives the effect of a local thrust on a living being done by some particles of the same type as those considered here for gravity, what is close to the optical tweezers relatively to small things (see end of the article 6 about magnet). Lastly the particles considered here for the general magnetic field of the Earth come from a quite weak magnetic field and should intervene by the dispersion of the particles participating in the magnetic field (being free for the participation in the gravity), and possibly by thrust, this rather at the poles, because the magnetic field is vertical at the poles (so thrust toward the top or the bottom in the field).

  Lastly for the credibility of black holes, it is possible to read this: http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101214/full/468876a.html 

 
Update 06/01/12:
  About the Cavendish experiment, it is done with some masses of lead; but considering my theory for magnet (see article 6), it is better to not omit the emissions of atoms and the organization of it, thus even if lead is not reacting like iron to the emission of the flow of a magnet, the organization of its own one, is not going against the fact that it can have an interaction which is particular, with a different correspondence between the pores (see article 7). Thus the interaction between the spheres of lead should not be the result of the attraction coming from the universal gravitation, but of a particular force field (which is not bizarre).
Update 23/03/12: No string balls and still no black holes produced by the LHC, according to the results of 2011 (which is not good for the current theory of gravity). See this publication: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.6396.pdf



Update 18/03/13: Searches for large extra dimensions, gravitons, microscopic black holes, long-lived particles, dark matter, and leptoquarks are presented in the report at the following address. No sign of these new physics phenomena has been observed so far.
  Also I want to make notice that my work is not concerned with what is considered in this report (currently everything is going well for it), for example about the Long-Lived Neutral Particles and it is possible to check it if you want by following the references in this document.

Report: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1500560?ln=en

   Otherwise there is also a publication about the lack of production of string balls and black holes at the LHC, following the data of 2012 and with a better sensitivity than in 2011. See this document: http://cds.cern.ch/record/1460444?ln=en

Monday, October 19, 2009

Article 9 second part

As well gravity is especially remarkable in the layer of inertia the closest to the Earth, what could be due to the fact that the rupture between this layer and the following one should be greater than between the others out of a greater variation of the angular velocity, what should form a higher resistance to the displacement of some particles (see last posts). Thus considering the different ruptures so the different resistances it is normal that there is an impression of a relative weightlessness in some layers between the Earth and the Moon; what should be accentuated by the fact that more the energetic concentration forming the primary particles is low more the degree of fractality is high (1), then less the particles resist to a displacement, in the same manner than when the viscosity is lesser in the usual fluids.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html

Friday, October 16, 2009

Article 9 first part

Gravity should not be without an energetic equilibrium, as well it is considered to have a constant force following a same gravimetric geoid, and posing that all equilibrium is limited in time except with a divine and absolute consideration, this implies that it should be maintained; therefore if I am not mistaken it is not good to think that the force could exist without any movement and that it could thus produce a variable quantity of it (4). So in order to explain gravity in a rational manner, we could suppose that it should be maintained by some flows of some particles of the two first secondary elements(1) and especially of some malleable ones and of some of the smallest ones in cycle which do not produce any warmth in a considerable manner(2), which should be applied in an almost homogeneous manner at the surface of an object, while they should penetrate also its inside by almost all the pores, what should reduce the importance of the mass and of the surface if it is possible to neglect the resistance of air; to our knowledge these flows have two principal and constant sources of particles, which are the light of the Sun and the radiation of the Earth. As well light could all the same penetrate the atmosphere despite the resistance at the rupture between two layers (see atmosphere in the 3 last posts) because it arrives in sufficiently dense and fast flows, nevertheless it should be this same resistance which should do that these particles could push on us, because when they should be in a concentration less dense than in the light, despite their velocity they should meet a resistance which should make them have a spinning motion or in circle being able to be developed in a helicoidal manner, and make them form some winds by a massive reorientation, but as well push the denser objects toward the bottom(3) out of the intermediate of the smallest cyclic secondary particles; this thrust should be formed because the very fast motion of the malleable particles and their size which lets them pass almost everywhere make them more suitable for going in the superior layers (see atmosphere). Thus the particles which should form this gravity should be at the basis the primary particles or malleable ones obtained by fractalization, which are endowed with an autonomous and very fast movement (2); and particularly the ones which are at the level of the body and should be on the way, following their progress toward the top and not the bottom, to take its place, next to pass above it with transmitting the motion especially out of the smallest cyclic particles; besides the flow already oriented of the particles toward the possibility to escape by the top orients easily the ones which are entering and diluting in the layer where it acts, knowing as stated previously that this flow is supplied with some particles out of a flow coming from under the soil out of the radiation of the Earth, and which periodically is reinforced by the particles coming from the Sun which are stopped at the level of the soil and by the clouds partly and have in the same manner a facility to tend toward the top, while they maintain a constant concentration in certain limits because the atmospheric resistance is not impossible to penetrate, also this resistance acts a little as a valve which should be more or less opened according to the pressure.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html
(2) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/article-2.html
(3) : Light (except laser) should not oppose any considerable resistance to the bodies which can be detected by our senses because in order to act thus on these bodies it should pass by the intermediate of the other particles of the atmosphere which oppose a higher resistance and of which it should determine the trajectory in its direction without dispersing them; thus the action for conducting motion should depend as for warmth on the particles mixed with a flow of some malleable particles, because it should be especially the smallest cyclic particles, which do not produce any warmth in a considerable manner, which should be effective in order to transmit motion because they react normally better; but these particles should be in a higher concentration in the atmosphere than in light, out of the space (between them) that the concentration of the malleable particles implies, according to what the motion of the malleable particles should be better conducted by the atmosphere thus composed than by light, and when light is mixing with it, it is possible to suppose the presence of some beams of light, what at least the presence of some atoms make unavoidable out of their resistance in some masses to the luminous flow. About laser, the action is especially thermal, what is possible according to the proportion between the malleable particles and thermal ones (mixing forced at the basis), and even if the concentration of particles producing warmth need not to be very high in order to make it perceptible, the production of a relatively weak motion is possible out of their action. Lastly for the fission of an atom, the malleable particles being so much concentrated in an atom that at the moment of the phenomenon they should be deployed in a bowl, which for being diluted should not have any other possibility than to drive at its front all the most suitable particles in order to transmit motion and the others, because they could not avoid them considering the absence of any beam at the basis and their very high density.

(4) : Update 13/04/2011: See about Newton:       http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2010/09/criticism-of-gravity-by-newton.html

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Article 8 last part

Also it is possible out of neglecting the gravity to explain in a Cartesian manner (see "The World" by Descartes) how an object can go into orbit in a layer; we can consider that going at a certain speed with a certain inclination it will have a tendency to go at the location of the layer (if there is one) where the particles move themselves at the same speed and in the same direction, by assuming a possible loss of speed before to join a suitable position (see sketch 1), knowing that it must at least drive away the particles being at the place where it will be able to stabilize; also in order that this should be possible, the trajectory of the object should be sufficiently close of the one to incorporate, if not its kinetic energy will make it continue farther if this energy is superior to the one of the formed set at every moment by the met particles. In order that all of this should be clear the motion of the displacement of the object should be considered, as the sum at every moment of two perpendicular straight motions, and the same for the decomposition of the one of the layer in a same Cartesian coordinate system; as well for the layer if we consider one of these motions which is the one which represents the tendency to go in a straight line, tangential to the circular movement (or almost circular) , and if this component is superior at a location of a layer to the one corresponding for the object, then the displacement pushes as much as possible the object to follow its circular movement (or almost circular), or if this component of the displacement of a layer is inferior or of the opposite direction, the movement tends as well to drive the object, but here following an inclination contrary to the previous one (see sketch 2). Lastly if the gravity is considered for the fact to go into orbit, the object should be at the place corresponding to its density in a layer so possibly at the inferior limit, or it should be able to compensate the deviation, as the artificial satellites can do, otherwise it is possible to imagine if the object is a star with a sky an interaction with the level higher than the layer where it should be (see article 10 to come).




Monday, October 12, 2009

Article 8 second part

In order to come back to the rotation velocities in the layers we can consider that the aerial set turning with a planet can as well be named its sky, also we can consider that following the observations it should seem that the sky of the Moon should be composed in majority by some particles of the two first secondary elements, because atoms and molecules have not been noticed in a considerable manner. Now with this vocabulary we can consider that the difference of the rotation velocities between the layers could be supported by the fact that the Moon is not staying constantly above the same point of the terrestrial globe, what should stem from the interactions between some different skies, as the ones of the Moon, the Earth, and the Sun (see sketches 1 and 3, plus the article 10 to come), where the sky of the Moon could interfere with an isolating layer between the layer where it is and an other layer or the sky of the Sun; what should imply that there should be a resistance which should make vary the velocity of the layers at the limit of the skies and even which should be the cause of the formation of the isolated layers, knowing that the disposition of the arms of a galaxy seems to show a resistance at the limit of the different skies and a gradual reduction of the velocity by going toward the periphery, if not the homogeneous rotation should not form any spiral; otherwise we can remark that the astronomical revolutions of the planets of the solar system decrease by going toward the periphery. Also in order to show well the reduction of the angular velocity in the terrestrial sky due to the resistance at its periphery, it is possible to calculate the (approximate) velocity of the Moon around the Earth if it should have the same angular velocity than the Earth, in order to relativize:

Velocity at the surface of the Earth = its perimeter / its time of rotation on its axis
= diameter * Pi / 24 hours
= 7926 miles (or 12 756 km) * 3.1416 / 24 h
= 1037.5 miles/hour (or 1670 km/h)

Velocity of the Moon around the Earth without any resistance = 2 * distance from the Earth to the Moon * Pi / time of a rotation of the Earth on its axis
= 2 * 238 855 miles (or 384 400 km) * 3.1416 / 24 h
= 62 532 miles/h (or 100 636 km/h)

Real velocity of the Moon around the Earth = 2 * distance from the Earth to the Moon * Pi / time of revolution of the Moon
= 2 * 238 855 * 3.1416 / 655.75 h
= 2 289 miles/h (or 3 683 km/h)

We can then observe a very important difference of the velocity of the Moon with what it should have been without any resistance, according to what we can tend to confirm that there is a reduction of the angular velocity by going toward the periphery of the sky, and that the Moon is close to the limit of the terrestrial sky. Also following these observations and out of considering the division into some layers, it should be normal that the angular velocities decrease from a layer to the other by starting from the center and going toward the periphery; the isolating layers having an intermediate motion (see last post). According to what in each layer there should be a different inertia.












Friday, October 9, 2009

Article 8 first part

Atmosphere could be due to the spinning motion of the star, and for our senses to the formation of gases coming from the volcanic activity or some other phenomenons related to the mass in fusion as breaks. But the spinning motion only should not be sufficient because thus it should produce some constant winds and disperse the gases, it is necessary then that is formed, in addition of the gaseous layers close to the Earth, some spherical isolated layers, forming an inertia to the displacements due to the spinning motion, and constituted in majority of some invisible particles, as the Van Allen’s belts (discovered by Van Allen, from the USA), and a little as the rings that some heaps of the visible matter form around Saturn, Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune, although in this case there is only a slice; on the top of that it has to be considered some different rotation velocities which should be related to some layers (see sketches 1 and 2), what should form a resistance by discontinuity to the crossing motion going from one to the other, and should imply then an equilibrium which should retain more or less the different particles. Also in order to explain the insulation of these layers it is possible to imagine between them a thickness, low in resistance to circular movements on each side, which should be formed of some particles of the two first secondary elements(1) which could have some helicoidal motions with accompanying the movement of each layer, as the ones formed by a screw or the displacement of a spinning propeller but adapted to the change of angular velocity (relatively to the center of rotation of the layers), and arranged between them according to their direction of rotation, what should give a configuration which could look like Rayleigh-BĂ©nard’s cells of convection, although this phenomenon should not be identical and has been inspired differently to me, by a simple log of wood at the surface of some water; otherwise these particles could form an amalgam of whirls when a sufficiently intense light(2) or something else should come to break the regularity of the motion by its crossing action. The fact that there is some resistance between some different layers of the atmosphere is confirmed by the observations done during the travels of some rockets.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html
(2): Which should be filtered during its crossing action.




About the action of the moon, it is to come.





Update 03/01/13: After a study of the Cassini mission which is about Saturn, I have found some documents which confirm what is written here.

  First there is the fact that farther the matter is from Saturn slower it orbits, what is possible to read here [1] (click on “here”).

[1]: About the gravity of the moon Prometheus, it is not obvious; furthermore it is written that the concerned particles are some icy particles, and the presence of ice should make them sticky, thus some of them should stick a bit to Prometheus after the contact (it is also possible to have some informations about the sticky snowballs here).

  Otherwise about the different rotation velocities of some layers producing a resistance by discontinuity to the crossing motion going from one to the other: After the contact between the moon Prometheus[1] and one of the ringlets of the F ring (about the contact it is possible to watch here, pay attention to the shadow of the moon), there is a black mark longer than large which is present (which is not the shadow of the moon). Also relatively to the images to come, this being produced one time per orbit and Prometheus going faster than the F ring, the next black mark is produced in front of the last one. And if we observe well the different marks here and here, it appears well that after a while there is a fracture at the level of the clearest ringlet that is produced in the continuity of these marks, and this seems to indicate well that some ringlets are not going at the same velocity, so as to form a discontinuity.

[1] Moon which does not seem to have a sky and which bounces on the F ring made of solid particles, which implies the unstable trajectory of this moon.

 
  Lastly an observation which is not concerning the Cassini mission: Relatively to the phenomenon of gravitational lens, it seems very probable that the presence of the layers considered in this article can produce such an effect.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Article 7

The magnetic field as a specific force field to magnet is drawn around it in its usual shape, in parallelepiped, in a particular manner, which is in butterfly; what could be explained according to the theory previously developed (see last post) by the fact that magnet following a geometrical and homogeneous formation, as for usual crystals, should develop a set of homogeneous and geometrical motions. Thus in the case of magnet according to an axis of distribution the pores located on a side should have an attractive power stemming from the depression formed by the accompaniment of the internal movement in cyclone, which should drive the surrounding particles of the two first secondary elements (1), and on the other side should have an expulsive power stemming from the pressure formed by the cyclonic leaving motion. But out of equilibrium the leaving cyclones should be complementary of the cyclonic inlets, thus it should be normal that at the level of the considered axis of distribution, should be shaped with the greatest simplicity some bridges between the cyclonic pores of inlet and of outlet, next for the formation of some bridges between farther pores, this should be done by a logical concatenation, because on a side of the leaving or entering cyclone should be a free space stemming from the curving in bridge of the cyclone of the same type at this place, and on the other should be the resistance and even the pressure formed by an unlinked cyclone of the same type, knowing that there should not be any fusion between the cyclones on the same side of the mentioned axis because they should have the same direction of rotation and thus push back themselves; according to what the one considered should be pushed alongside the bridge formed previously, thus should be curved and should form on its turn a bridge by finding on its way a complementary cyclone, but farther the pores should be, weaker the strength of the bridge should be because of the dispersion of the cyclonic motion. Lastly logically it should come that the fact to be complementary or the resistance between two poles of some different magnets should stem from the type of cyclone met, leaving or entering; also it should be considered that the contact between two magnets implies, relatively to the whole of both, that the cyclones should have a denser movement than before the contact, out of a highest concentration of particles following the trajectory which should be offered to them out of resisting to their straight motion, particles which should go through a longer distance before to have the liberty of a straighter way, what the experiment checks.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html


Monday, October 5, 2009

Article 6

The mineral magnet following the logic developed should be a structure of which the arrangement should form some helicoidal movements then some whirls permanently, what should drive continually the particles of the two first secondary elements and especially the smallest ones (1), with creating like this a force field; there it should be considered especially some whirls because the attraction between some magnets or with some iron is specially strong, what helicoidal connections can particularly justify. The helicoidal movement in magnet should come from the flow of the particles going out of the atoms constituting it, this flow should have as a cause the decomposition in some straight lines of the cyclic movements present in the atom, decomposition which should provoke the ephemeral feature (relatively to an absolute consideration) of their cycle of existence ( see article 3). The orientation of the flow of emission should be done during the formation of the magnet where all the atoms and parts are orientating themselves (one another) as for the formation of the crystalline networks which form the tremies (from the Latin: trimodia, sort of pyramid hollowed out) of sodium chloride. The particles concerned being the ones which are found in light (in probably some different proportions) their quantity of motion is Q = m * c, and the force field that they form contains a kinetic energy E = ½ * m *c² ; where c is the velocity of light, and m corresponds to the quantity of particles displaced in the flow. The quantity of motion should be considerable in a durable manner in an atom without being maintained, because the movement of light is relatively stable, what should be found as well in this case; otherwise in the majority of cases there is in a non-negligible manner some transmissions of some particles and of their movement to which the kinetic energy gives utterance, besides the atomic energy of fission should come from the rupture of the cycle of a nucleus, which in its energetic liberation should permit among others the production or liberation of some inferior cycles giving the neutron, which could be named intermedion in this system. Also we can notice a particular affinity with iron, and this should be due to the fact that its structure is close to the one of the mineral magnet which is an oxide of iron and its rate of radiation should be as well close to the other one, although it should permit a less dense outflow for each pore and differently arranged in a pore and between the pores, but which is possible to influenced; thus should be produced an attraction by the propagation of the movement in cyclone, acting as a screw, phenomenon which seems as well to be produced with nickel and cobalt, of which the atomic weight are close to the one of iron; generally for the other materials the strength of the flows and the width of the pores should permit to the contact to be done without any particular resistance (2). Besides with some iron it is possible to make an electromagnet out of rolling up a wire of iron around a core of iron by a helicoidal manner (which may not be by chance) and well tight, and out of making pass a flow of some electric particles through it, then of the ones which pass generally in a magnet, with a possible variation in the proportion between the concentrations of the particles of the first and second secondary element (1) according to the type of magnet (electro or mineral). On the top of that we can remark that when the current increases in the electromagnet, some warmth is produced, what confirms the importance of the concentration of the particles of the two first secondary elements for its production; also out of increasing more we can obtain some light which depends especially on the concentration of energy in the form of some malleable particles, then on the type of these particles according to the fractality (see article 2).

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html
(2): We can all the same note diamagnetism, which generally has a weak effect.


Update 05/04/2011: In order to be sure of the resistance of some helicoidal movements of some particles of the same type as the particles considered for the magnet, which allows here the consideration of a force field, it is possible to read (optical tweezers are interesting here): http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100916092055.htm

Friday, October 2, 2009

Article 5

Piezo electricity should come from the fact that the flows, stemmed from the decomposition of the equilibriums of a molecular assembly in crystals, should be distributed according to a network which subjected to a pressure should concentrate them in a manner which should make them electric; what the constraint sustained by the atoms could increase relatively to the emission of the nucleus.

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Article 4

The non-artificial radioactivity concerns the heavy atoms, and considering a high density, which should contain more moving particles or/and some particles having a degree of fractality lesser(1), what should implies that by the deterioration of the equilibriums which are composing them, they could emit some very strong and penetrating flows of radiations.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html