Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Interesting things


  The validity of a work like mine having to be tested, I have made the effort to note some things that I have placed among my updates at the end of some publications. Also I must confess that I am rather proud of what I have noted in the article 8 and which is related to the 9 (without considering the big amount of data to analyze), because a new theory has to be a better tool for reflection (more logical) in order to be valid, but thus it follows also the truth, and when they meet it is really a completion (thought is a real asset for prevision). But the other updates have not to be disregarded.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Some new things


  I have done some updates again at the end of some posts.

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Updates

  It is possible to find some updates at the end of some posts for my scientific articles, and of the last post. Otherwise I did arrange the blog in a shorter version of my work. So if some are interested …

Monday, November 8, 2010

Sportsman

  Science ? Nobody cares…I will not have enough money in order to stop crime, and I need to breed and nobody can do it instead of me, so it will be a crime also to not do it (do not kill the babies).

May be I can be a sportsman :) .


  O.K. it is true that I am already 35 years old and soon 36, but I will have more persons interested in what I am doing; and I will not need to wait until I have some problems with my organs for breeding (it begins often at 40 years old, I have heard). Thanks science :) nonetheless medicine is a science. But I know, what I have done in science is the kind of thing used almost all over Europe and the world, and not only in France.


P.-S.: For those who want to do more or less the same thing in any country, before to work hard, it should be better to unify in order to make that such a work has what it deserves when it needs it and not when it is too late.

Update of the 02/04/2011: Since last month I am 36 years old. 


Update 15/04/2011:

Why normally intelligent men want to have what they deserve



  If one reads Charles Sanders Peirce it appears that instinct is an important thing. And if we consider breeding and some animals like the red squirrel, it comes that abundance is an important element for begetting; this because instinctively when there is not enough elements of abundance like food, the female rejects the male. Thus the feeling of affluence seems to trigger off the desire of breeding, and it seems also that it works with women, thus it is just instinctive and they are not bad because they prefer men with a good amount of wealth. So if we consider the fact that the best women will go preferably with the men who have enough wealth, the men who are more important for the well-being of a country will need to have enough wealth in order to have the women who correspond to them. And here we need to consider that if the intelligent men do not have the good women, they risk more to have some children which are not like them and more like not very intelligent workers for example. Finally if instinct seems not avoidable, after several centuries of observation of the behavior of humanity, some excesses can be avoided and prevented by thought and the advices coming from it.      

P.-S.: Also the article 6 of the declaration of the human rights of 1789, in France, is going in this direction considering virtues and talents. Even if history teaches us that a revolution with the people is not the best way in order to arrange things for intelligent persons; but republic is a good thing.

Update 03/04/12: Since last month there have been 37 years since I was born a healthy baby of 3.150 kg and 50 cm without a premature birth (and this is official).

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Criticism of gravity by Newton

  In order to sustain my theory about gravity (see my work in physics by making a click on October 2009, in 2009 on the right in the “blog archive”, especially the article 9):


“Conjectures and refutations”, chapter 3, part 3, by Karl R. Popper



About Newton:



… This explains that he did very deeply feel the unfinished character of his theory, also the necessity to consider gravity. “That Gravity, writes Newton (See the letter to Richard Bentley, 25th of February 1692-3 (so 1693); see also the letter of the 17th of January.), is innate, inherent and essential in matter, in such a way that a body can act on an other at a distance […] is for me a so huge absurdity that I believe that a person a minimum competent in philosophy will never can fall in this error.”



A bit further:



“Nonetheless, Newton was an essentialist. He did devote some important efforts in order to search for an ultimate explanation for gravity which could be acceptable by trying to deduce the law of the attraction from the hypothesis of a mechanical thrust, only type of causal action admitted by Descartes because the only one which can be explained by the essential propriety of all bodies, extent. But he did not succeed in it. And we can be sure that if he did succeed, he should have considered that his problem did receive its final solution and that he did find the ultimate explanation of gravity…”

_

But this is true that to think about different ways to explain gravity can help to have some good ideas about other things, even if what is considered is not the final solution for gravity.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

About a Cartesian Bank

About a Cartesian Bank:


I only miss the capital, even if I have some wise projects for my money; also I hope that some contributions (see the last post) will bring some.



To loan:



The useful and fair virtue: in order to help to do some virtuous things with enough warranties for the return, without forgetting the fact that for the damages which occurred on what has been lent, there should be a compensation, and this following the price in effect. Otherwise for the interest what should be taken into account are the costs of management, the risk of use against the interest of the lender; also the motivation in order to compensate for the psychological uneasiness coming from the possibility of absence of return, if nothing is done in order to assure that this can not occur. Lastly the fact to have a capital only for loaning money is acceptable, if this is well done, so by having the office of a person of Law, by checking the morality of the borrowers and of their request; as well it can be good to encourage virtue by some growing advantages for the maintenance of a good social order.



The useless and unfair vice: in order to keep going vice, and/or without some good warranties about the return, what pushes to some grave actions in order to recover a possession, which can annihilate the life of a person and of this one’s entourage, while the guarantee to not have to come to this is preferable; unless one is vicious to the point of being perverse, what can go as far as wanting to do an additional margin with the sale of what has been taken for the compensation of the absence of recovery, but here one risks the hatred of some persons who do not have a lot of things which are attaching them to life. Lastly for the interest it is bad to ask too much of it with paying oneself above the merit of the office and the incurred risks, and to favor vice.

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

To contribute

To contribute (about money):




The useful and fair virtue: give some money in order to carry out a virtuous project for which one has a more or less direct interest, what a tax can organize in some cases (knowing this one can bring some returns). For instance, in the case of a virtuous work of which one knows that it will be useful for the state, but which by its character is not being sold directly to the public in a quantity representing its merit (not commercial), public who nonetheless will benefit from it more or less directly, it is true in this case a tax can be organized in order to reward the merit of the one (or those) who has (have) produced this work.



The useless and unfair vice: the same thing for a vicious project. For example: in order to make lose confidence to those who deserve more.