20 years

 

            I am a philosopher since 20 years now (See: Bibliothèque Nationale de France), this means also that since 20 years my philosophical work has not been refuted and thus my different reasonings (theories), knowing that almost every day some persons of different countries are reading a part of this (I have these statistics). This work has been published for the first time as a paper version and was composed of 5 books and an addenda which are covering things, considering the greatest stages, from the cause of Existence and the creation of matter (metaphysics, cosmology, physics, chemistry, biology ...) until the existence of humanity and its organisation (morals, politics, ...). Also it is possible to read it (which form a doctrine) currently as an electronic version (see my blogs), and a new paper version could come.

            Otherwise as a reference point, it is possible to consider that J.-J. Rousseau did try to work on chemistry, then the creation of matter and this probably in order to have his own cosmology (which is important in philosophy), but he did not success in it, if we consider his work “Institutions chimiques”, then it is a great performance that I did success in it and that this work is still valid since 20 years, this without forgetting that J.-J. Rousseau is a famous philosopher of whom the usefulness is not to prove.

 

Pseudonyme: Serge (De) L’Eternel

Some new things about politics

 

            I did add a (second) new model of constitution to my political work (management of a country), and I did put some extracts of it, as an update in the political posts of this blog, among some other updates about politics. Also if you want to read my political work on this blog, you can follow the link bellow (the first post is at the bottom), afterward you can follow the same recommendations as in the part about the “BEGINNING” at the top of the right column of this blog.

 

Link for my political work on this blog: https://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/12/

 

            Also for a good introduction to what is published on this blog, here is the address of my blog about the "Discourse on the Method" by Descartes: 

https://sergelecoz.wordpress.com/

You can read it like a book (good for mind sport or training but I did remove some parts in order to avoid plagiarism)

    A lot of this blog is from a book, I did publish as a paper book, but I do not need to publish again the scientific results (and some other things) which are in it ; so a part of it is here and this is enough currently. Then in order to read this blog like a book, you can read about the "BEGINNING" on the right. Otherwise, I did put some comments and in order to read them (where I did put something), you can click on the title of the post, in order to see the comment(s) at the bottom of the post. Also, I am not writing  for the people (I am sure, because I did notice, that the ones who read my work are generally with a minimum of intelligence, but everybody can try to read it), then I am not a star for the people (rock star, ...), so it is normal if you do not see a lot about me (I do not want to be pretentious, but it was almost the same thing for Descartes, when he was alive), because there are less intelligent persons than others (I do not want to be unpleasant with anybody).

    Otherwise it is possible to read the articles 3 (full, this is my new model for the structure of atom), 6, 8, 10 (full) if you ask for it (you can leave a commentary or use facebook), if you have some relevant reasons to request it. Also it is the same for my two new models of constitutions (politics).

Interesting things

  The validity of a work like mine having to be tested, I have made the effort to note some things that I have placed among my updates at the end of some publications. Also I must confess that I am rather proud of what I have noted in the article 8 and which is related to the 9 (without considering the big amount of data to analyze), because a new theory has to be a better tool for reflection (more logical) in order to be valid, but thus it follows also the truth, and when they meet it is really a completion (thought is a real asset for prevision). But the other updates have not to be disregarded.

Some new things

  I have done some updates again at the end of some posts.

Updates

  It is possible to find some updates at the end of some posts. Otherwise I did arrange the blog in a shorter version of my work. So if some are interested …

Criticism of gravity by Newton

  In order to sustain my theory about gravity (see my work in physics by making a click on October 2009, in 2009 on the right in the “blog archive”, especially the article 9):


“Conjectures and refutations”, chapter 3, part 3, by Karl R. Popper



About Newton:



… This explains that he did very deeply feel the unfinished character of his theory, also the necessity to consider gravity. “That Gravity, writes Newton (See the letter to Richard Bentley, 25th of February 1692-3 (so 1693); see also the letter of the 17th of January.), is innate, inherent and essential in matter, in such a way that a body can act on an other at a distance […] is for me a so huge absurdity that I believe that a person a minimum competent in philosophy will never can fall in this error.”



A bit further:



“Nonetheless, Newton was an essentialist. He did devote some important efforts in order to search for an ultimate explanation for gravity which could be acceptable by trying to deduce the law of the attraction from the hypothesis of a mechanical thrust, only type of causal action admitted by Descartes because the only one which can be explained by the essential propriety of all bodies, extent. But he did not succeed in it. And we can be sure that if he did succeed, he should have considered that his problem did receive its final solution and that he did find the ultimate explanation of gravity…”

_

But this is true that to think about different ways to explain gravity can help to have some good ideas about other things, even if what is considered is not the final solution for gravity.