To read before :
http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/08/heisenberg-and-god.html
God as Energy with an absolute consideration seems to be an easy concept, nevertheless It is the complexity at its highest true and coherent level, because It is composed of all existing thing. Following what, It is changing and immutable at the same time in Its evolution rules, and then identical with an absolute consideration. On the top of that it is better to understand that we are able to consider It only as It has decided to introduce to us, noticing that the human nature is approximate in its evaluations, and that some things can be different for God’s will-power and for the weakness of our soul. However it is encouraging because out of the divine immensity we will always have something to think about and to discover; as well we have better to be careful not to confuse complexity and absurdity, just as simplicity and short reasoning, because the simplest thing is the most coherent, following a rigorous and detailed analysis. As well we have better to consider that our nature permits us only to believe really what is compatible with what we already know, if not we would risk to fall in madness and its excesses ; therefore in order to innovate we always need some demonstrations which are rigorous and without any deceit.
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Characteristic 3
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Energy as a characteristic
To read before :
http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/08/heisenberg-and-god.html
God in Its essence is Energy permitting all energies transformable one in another more or less directly (chemical, mechanical...), It is then eternal, and indivisible with an absolute consideration because all Its parts are from the same substance with this consideration ; as well it cannot be any absolute vacuum occupying a space between its parts, for the reason that the presence of an absolute vacuum should be equivalent as noticing that they are perfectly sticking together, thus an expanse absolutely empty is not an expanse, but nothing.
http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/08/heisenberg-and-god.html
God in Its essence is Energy permitting all energies transformable one in another more or less directly (chemical, mechanical...), It is then eternal, and indivisible with an absolute consideration because all Its parts are from the same substance with this consideration ; as well it cannot be any absolute vacuum occupying a space between its parts, for the reason that the presence of an absolute vacuum should be equivalent as noticing that they are perfectly sticking together, thus an expanse absolutely empty is not an expanse, but nothing.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
The main God’s characteristics
To read before :http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/08/heisenberg-and-god.html
God is infinitely perfect and cause of everything which exists, thus everything is made perfectly at all the steps of creation. As well all these things which seem imperfections to us are at least nevertheless often an intermediary for the human being’s comprehension, because out of understanding what seems to us disorder we success to find in a more complete manner the or the several causes of the usual order.
God is infinitely perfect and cause of everything which exists, thus everything is made perfectly at all the steps of creation. As well all these things which seem imperfections to us are at least nevertheless often an intermediary for the human being’s comprehension, because out of understanding what seems to us disorder we success to find in a more complete manner the or the several causes of the usual order.
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Heisenberg and God
Heisenberg and God in “Physics and Beyond” of Werner Heisenberg (Nobel Prize laureate), a book not only scientific but as well political, moral, and about philosophy and religion :
Wolfgang (Pauli, Nobel Prize laureate in physics) asked : “When you say that one could not understand anymore the quantum theory, do you want to say by this that physics is not only composed by experimentation on one side and mathematical formulas on the other, but that at the junction of both some true philosophy should be done? Said differently, that there it has to be tried, using the natural language, to explain what does really happen in this margin between experimentation and mathematics? I suppose besides that all the difficulties that one meets in order to understand the quantum theory are precisely at this place where the positivists, generally do not stop…” (See the part : “Positivism, metaphysics and religion”)
“Positivists, did I say (Heisenberg Nobel Prize laureate in physics), do defend with a particular virulence against all the formulations of problems which, as they say, present a prescientific feature…” (See the same part)
“For my part, continued Niels (Bohr, Nobel Prize laureate in physics, also reserved about positivism), I can obviously not agree with such a language shrinkage…”(See the same part)
Heisenberg is adding later :
“In science, the central order can be recognized by the simple fact that we can use some metaphors such as : “nature is created following this plan”. And this is here that my conception of truth is bound to the state of things to which religions do refer. I think that all these correlations can be better thought now, since we have understood the quantum theory. Because in this theory, we can formulate in the mathematical abstract language a unified order extending on some very wide domains…” (See the same part)
“Yes answered Wolfgang, I believe that this model of thought is very understandable…” (See the same part)
Wolfgang did ask me in a quite abrupt manner :
“Basically do you believe in a personal God?…” (See the same part)
I answered : “Can I formulate differently the question that you did ask me? It should be then asked like this : Can you, or can one, communicate as directly with the central order of things or phenomena (the existence of this order being not doubtful) as one communicate, eventually, with the soul of a human being?...” (See the same part)
It seems thus easier for a religion to separate from the notion of God, the first cause and the central order (See Buddhism), than for sciences and especially at the basis the quantum mechanics (then chemistry…). Thus my work is not religious (there is no cult), and even when I relate about morality, I stay at the level of the moral advice. (Serge LE COZ L'ETERNEL)
Wolfgang (Pauli, Nobel Prize laureate in physics) asked : “When you say that one could not understand anymore the quantum theory, do you want to say by this that physics is not only composed by experimentation on one side and mathematical formulas on the other, but that at the junction of both some true philosophy should be done? Said differently, that there it has to be tried, using the natural language, to explain what does really happen in this margin between experimentation and mathematics? I suppose besides that all the difficulties that one meets in order to understand the quantum theory are precisely at this place where the positivists, generally do not stop…” (See the part : “Positivism, metaphysics and religion”)
“Positivists, did I say (Heisenberg Nobel Prize laureate in physics), do defend with a particular virulence against all the formulations of problems which, as they say, present a prescientific feature…” (See the same part)
“For my part, continued Niels (Bohr, Nobel Prize laureate in physics, also reserved about positivism), I can obviously not agree with such a language shrinkage…”(See the same part)
Heisenberg is adding later :
“In science, the central order can be recognized by the simple fact that we can use some metaphors such as : “nature is created following this plan”. And this is here that my conception of truth is bound to the state of things to which religions do refer. I think that all these correlations can be better thought now, since we have understood the quantum theory. Because in this theory, we can formulate in the mathematical abstract language a unified order extending on some very wide domains…” (See the same part)
“Yes answered Wolfgang, I believe that this model of thought is very understandable…” (See the same part)
Wolfgang did ask me in a quite abrupt manner :
“Basically do you believe in a personal God?…” (See the same part)
I answered : “Can I formulate differently the question that you did ask me? It should be then asked like this : Can you, or can one, communicate as directly with the central order of things or phenomena (the existence of this order being not doubtful) as one communicate, eventually, with the soul of a human being?...” (See the same part)
It seems thus easier for a religion to separate from the notion of God, the first cause and the central order (See Buddhism), than for sciences and especially at the basis the quantum mechanics (then chemistry…). Thus my work is not religious (there is no cult), and even when I relate about morality, I stay at the level of the moral advice. (Serge LE COZ L'ETERNEL)
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Existence of God and Its relation with humanity
In order to have a good approach of this system, we can consider that the fact is sure that God is composed of forces which dominate the body of the human being we are, as well the one of all the creatures of our planet, if we stop at what we can easily notice. The fact is then neat that these forces participate in the divine equilibrium in a more important way than humanity, even if their actions engender it then have it as finality, because out of the same way the human being has the engine in part as finality. We should then consider that God is not an animal, not more one of the elements which dominate us, but a lot more than these: Energy which balances itself in the pure state and according to the energetic potential of all the elements which form Nature. Nature here can be considered as an under-set which is the sensual world and its variations, with God going further as the first cause of the creation of this world ; and then obviously cause of the human being, if not we should not subject ourselves to Its divine laws out of our dependence. Thus the fact is neat that we are made of God’s substance which is Energy with an absolute consideration, as well it is able to agglutinate by equilibrium in some different particles in order to form all atoms, which form molecules, which form matter in general; after out of the increase of the complexity of the energetic assembly is coming up the organic life which differentiates from the inanimate matter by an independent system of multiplication. So in reality the human being can be defined as God’s image as it is a continuous and complex set of some energetic equilibriums, which anyway is not of the same fullness.
Saturday, June 28, 2008
The realization of a system
To read before :
http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/08/heisenberg-and-god.html
The first clear conception, according to chemistry, I had from God before consulting any book was that It was the Equilibrium of all things or under-equilibriums, thus in a general way Its application was the intermediate and final cause of creation, also It was applying to energy as the component of matter, which could be considered as eternal and non-created. Then between the reading of René Descartes and a pantheist, during I was searching a system compatible with both, I did have the idea that Energy as representing motion and the origin of matter was a concept which was corresponding to the requirements. After in a lecturing book, I did meet the Aristotle’s system which can be approached from the René Descartes’ one: the Aristotle’s one in fact was close to my first conception with the consideration of the first cause of movement and the original matter; and may be more the Descartes’ one considering the first cause of motion and energy, if it is possible to separate them here. Finally I had decided to develop my second system, knowing that it is quite compatible with some of the others, and that the fact it considers movement as an attribute of Energy is quite important, because the energy of movement is the equivalent of time, seeing that it cannot be without motion; then here we have the theory which is that time is a dimension of space so of what occupies it, and which cannot be something else than energy with an absolute consideration ; noticing that the other dimensions are height, length, and the quantity of energy contains in a space defined like this. As well with this system God is totally independent because any part of It applies to It only.
http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/08/heisenberg-and-god.html
The first clear conception, according to chemistry, I had from God before consulting any book was that It was the Equilibrium of all things or under-equilibriums, thus in a general way Its application was the intermediate and final cause of creation, also It was applying to energy as the component of matter, which could be considered as eternal and non-created. Then between the reading of René Descartes and a pantheist, during I was searching a system compatible with both, I did have the idea that Energy as representing motion and the origin of matter was a concept which was corresponding to the requirements. After in a lecturing book, I did meet the Aristotle’s system which can be approached from the René Descartes’ one: the Aristotle’s one in fact was close to my first conception with the consideration of the first cause of movement and the original matter; and may be more the Descartes’ one considering the first cause of motion and energy, if it is possible to separate them here. Finally I had decided to develop my second system, knowing that it is quite compatible with some of the others, and that the fact it considers movement as an attribute of Energy is quite important, because the energy of movement is the equivalent of time, seeing that it cannot be without motion; then here we have the theory which is that time is a dimension of space so of what occupies it, and which cannot be something else than energy with an absolute consideration ; noticing that the other dimensions are height, length, and the quantity of energy contains in a space defined like this. As well with this system God is totally independent because any part of It applies to It only.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
