Article 5

Piezo electricity should come from the fact that the flows, stemmed from the decomposition of the equilibriums of a molecular assembly in crystals, should be distributed according to a network which subjected to a pressure should concentrate them in a manner which should make them electric; what the constraint sustained by the atoms could increase relatively to the emission of the nucleus.

Article 4

The non-artificial radioactivity concerns the heavy atoms, and considering a high density, which should contain more moving particles or/and some particles having a degree of fractality lesser(1), what should implies that by the deterioration of the equilibriums which are composing them, they could emit some very strong and penetrating flows of radiations.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html

For the last post

In relation with the last post it is possible to read : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/science-and-quantum-mechanics.html

Article 3 first part

In order to define the chemical reactions following the system described in the previous posts it is possible to consider that the equilibrium between the malleable particles(1) gives the luminous flows, that the one between the particles of the two first secondary elements gives some flows as warmth, and electricity; that the equilibrium between those particles in a high density gives atoms; after that the resistances of the equilibriums (without considering how they are) between some different atoms permit their unions, where the preference of the bond is done relatively to the intensity of the resistance which produces the union, intensity which is possible to estimate (in some similar conditions); without forgetting that some weak interactions can occur in addition of the strong ones as the hydrogenated bonds between the molecules of water. About disunion it is caused according to the presence of the particles of the two first secondary elements which out of concentration can form a compensatory resistance, according to some other actions which put some space between two atoms, and according to the ages of atoms implying the dissipation of the equilibrium which is forming them; these principles being able to be induced to the actions between molecules, so between the chains of atoms. Thus it seems possible to be able to explain and symbolize the quantities of energy used during a reaction.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html

The best part is coming, it is my new model for the structure of atom. (It has been removed because of plagiarism, so in order to read it, see here: 

https://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2022/07/you-can-read-it-like-book-good-for-mind.html )

Science and quantum mechanics

Heisenberg : “ May be should it be possible to divide indefinitely matter, except that at the end it should not be really a division, but a transformation of energy into matter…” (See the part : “Discussion about language”)

For the structure of atom relatively to the one I will propose (Serge l’Eternel) :
Heisenberg : “Now, if a trajectory of electron does exist in a Wilson chamber, there must be one as well in atom. But I confess to already have had some doubts about it. Because if it is true that we calculate an electronic orbit following the classic Newtonian mechanics, we confer to it afterwards, with the help of the quantum conditions, a stability that it should never have in accordance with this same Newtonian mechanics ; and when the electron jumps (in the case of the emission of radiation) from an orbit to the other, we prefer to say nothing about this jump : is it a broad jump, a high jump or what else ? So in a certain sense, all the idea that we construct about the orbit of an electron inside atom has to be absurd. But then, what? (See the part : “The notion of “understand” in physics”)
Wolfgang (Pauli) approved. “All this is really extremely mysterious. If an orbit of electron does exist in atom, electron must obviously turn on this orbit in a periodic way, with a determined frequency. In that case, the laws of electrodynamics impose that the electrical oscillations come from the charge doing this periodic motion. In other words, some light has to be radiated with the same frequency. But in reality, this is not like this at all : the frequency of oscillation of the radiated light is in fact between the frequency of orbit which precedes the famous so mysterious jump and the one which follows. All this is basically pure madness.” (See the part : “The notion of “understand” in physics”)
Wolfgang : “…; with regard to both of us, honestly, we do even not believe in the electronic orbits…” (See the same part)
Heisenberg : “…Bohr must know, him also, that he begins with some hypotheses which contain some contradictions, which can not be right therefore in the considered form…” (See the same part)
Niels Bohr, Nobel Prize laureate in physics, and creator of the actual pattern for atom : “By stability, I mean that this is always the same substances, with the same properties, which appear…This is incomprehensible following the classic mechanics, especially if we admit that atom looks like a planetary system.” (See the same part)
He adds a bit further : “These images (of atoms), answered Bohr, have been deducted or rather if you prefer, “guessed” from experimental facts ; they are not the fruit of some sort of theoretical calculations. I Hope that these images describe the structure of atoms as good (but only as good) as possible in the visual language of the classic physics…”
Heisenberg : “But how will it be possible, in these conditions, to do some progresses? When all is said and done, has not it, physics, to be an exact science?” (See the same part)
“We must expect, said Bohr, that the paradoxes of the quantum theory, the incomprehensible aspects linked to the stability of matter, are going to be lighted in an always more distinct manner with every new experimental fact. If this is thus, we can hope that with time some new concepts will be formed, and that these new concepts will allow us to seize in a certain way even the not visual processes occurring in atom. But from that we are still very far.” (See the same part)

(From the same book as the previous post)

A bit of morality with Heisenberg

In “Physics and Beyond” of Werner Heisenberg (Nobel Prize laureate in physics), a book not only scientific but as well political, moral, and about philosophy and religion :

“…Nonetheless on a restriction basis, I have all the same to say that some rules exist which are effectively respected, though nobody does impose it. Thus, for example, we do not smoke and drink only rarely some alcohol…” (See the part : “A lesson of politics and history”)
Otherwise :
“The problem of values I said, this is the set of questions : what should we do? To what have we to aspire? How must we behave? The problem is then formulated by the human being and relatively to the human being ; this is the problem of the compass which has to orientate our way through life. This compass has received some very different names in the various religions and ideologies : “happiness”, “God’s willpower”, “the sense of life”, in order to quote just some of them…” (See the part : “Positivism, metaphysics and religion”)
As well about his relation with the Jews (without being one) when he did neither seem Marxist nor against workers :
“…About the anti-Semitism preached by Hitler, this is for me as well one of the most unpleasant aspects of the movement…” (See the part : “Revolution and university life”)
“…Our compatriots will understand, I hope fast enough, that we can not participate any more to the modern life without an efficient research ; they will may be acknowledge, especially relatively to the atomic physics, that the disdain shown toward the fundamental research by the actual national-socialist régime has contributed to the actual catastrophe or at least has constituted a symptom of it.” (See the part : “The way of the new start”)
What does sustain the theory following which Hitler was the false friend of the great innovators, which do not let dupe themselves and drive like this.
Finally we can read that the scientific thinkers are not some mad persons :
“…It is told that, when the first scientific society has been set up, they did take as a task to fight against the superstitions by refuting by some experiences the affirmations which were in the books of magic…” (See the part : “Positivism, metaphysics and religion”)

Article 2

Light logically should stem from the concentration of the malleable particles moving(1) themselves together or rather of their type if we consider the degree of fractality(2), and it can be accompanied by more or less warmth according to the quantity and the size of the sufficiently free particles of the second secondary element that it takes with(3) ; on the top of that for the luminous displacement we have better to remind that the primary or malleable particles directly obtained by the fractalization of Energy possess an autonomous and very fast movement out of the energetic attributes((2) and the posts of the same set), as well at a sufficient concentration of energy in a same direction, they can drive the particles formed by some cycles of these same primary particles, according to what they are at the foundation of all movements (in the case of light, see article 9 to come). Otherwise we could think that, out of the influence of the majority movement depending on the distribution of the energetic mass so on the shape, the movement in the malleable particle could orientate itself in a homogeneous manner.
But for our senses light possesses some different direct sources which can be some chemical reactions, as combustion, as well the one produces by fireflies, and the one corresponding to the nuclear fusions or the nuclear explosions ; but can also be electroluminescence produced for example by lightning. Besides we can notice that the luminous presence proves well here (in this system) that the energy is the same for electrons with electroluminescence during which they cohabit in a high concentration with light, and in nucleus with the light and not its absorption obtained with its opening. On the top of that, as it has been remarked in the previous article negativity can be accepted as it represents a lack, but it should unavoidably try to compensate itself, what is not observed here. Also if the search for absorption could be a present phenomenon for each peace of matter and proportional to its density, why to the planetary scale the biggest parts should be more easily attracted between them? Whereas thus they should cause to themselves more interaction as the identical parts of magnets, and then leave between them the small less dense particles, so of an inferior attraction; nevertheless flame goes up and there is not any space between a stone and the soil, at rest.
1: Colors could come from some different degrees of concentration. \ 2: See http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html \ 3: See http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html