Two new possibilities

(Updated on April 6, 2025)

The possibility of a spiritual relative democratic republic

Summary (I am proud to announce that J.-J. Rousseau and (De) Montesquieu did not not propose any new model of constitution like I am doing.):

“…But if it is true that a great prince is a rare man, what will a great legislator be like? The first has only to follow the model that the other must propose…” J.-J. Rousseau dans “Du contrat social” livre 2, chapitre 7.


This one would be a variant for the moderated democracy (and less expensive to run), which would consider and respect the intellectual and moral hierarchy in all the people[1], permitting thus a better equilibrium between the different parts of the population (when all of it has to take a decision without any representative, what progress permits more), and a better blossoming of the family by the intermediate of a feminine institution (with the possibility of a woman as a president and a kind of government…) permitting more independence to women (what would allow them to develop some works without any masculine pressure, and then to prove what they are able to do) after having considered the importance to have some children before living with more independence (but this breeding period should be accompanied with some rights in order that both parts of the couple have the same amount of respect, like the right to vote for women…) ; what the increase of the number of the rather old women justifies currently.

[1] See: http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2010/03/absolute-democratic-republic.html

Also the possibility of an aristocratic polyarchy  

Extracts

For a small state, monarchy (meaning, ruled by a single individual) can be more easily applicable than in a large state, because a monarch who is competent (and therefore wise) in different areas can more easily rule the different powers (an advantage being to have more coherence between the powers), because there are fewer different cases and therefore fewer laws, for example; thus it can remain rational considering the skills of a single man. Which implies that beyond a certain size a state may have to separate powers (an advantage being to minimize abuses while coherence becomes difficult to manage), which could give rise to what I call a "polyarchy" which could be ruled by several kings (accompanied by several queens), one for the judicial power, one for the legislative power and one for the executive power. It could also be possible to determine the biological age (health) after which a king should give way to a new king…

...Here I consider the fact that there is a basic natural order, for the organization between humans, predisposed in our genome and that this order would have been disrupted because of the consumption of certain products such as alcohol (religious tradition as with Christianity), tobacco, drugs (persistent traditions of certain countries that have become Muslim for example) and other products of the same kind. Also this consideration comes from the fact of personal observation that such an order can be observed with other living beings than humans and that this order can be disrupted by particular chemical products, but I still keep a hypothetical character to this human natural order. In addition we can note that if there is a basic human natural order, we are made to flourish and be happy in this order, thwarting instinct for too long and too strongly does not generally lead to happiness; so I consider this order for the human happiness...

... and women being led by a strong instinct, would organize themselves in a feminine way among themselves and in relation to men in a way that would be less problematic than with the consumption of the contraceptive pill which alters the presence of estrogen which partly defines feminine nature, or with the consumption of alcohol, tobacco, drugs or other products of the same type which disrupt feminine behavior (without forgetting diet, sport, sleep, etc.)...

If you want to read these constitutions, you can have a look here: https://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2022/07/you-can-read-it-like-book-good-for-mind.html

The democratic republic with a house of representatives

(Updated on February 24, 2025)

  The people lets its power be organized according to the specificity of the decisions and thus gives up its direct legislative power to a part of a parliament ; thus those who are designated as representatives of the people’s power have to help it to stay moral at the maximum in order to assume the other decisions, what is implied by the social contract. These representatives in our current democracies form what can be called the House of Representatives, which with what corresponds to the Senate form the Parliament (or Congress) which is used for legislating ; for what is concerning the Senate it can be occupied by the nobility and the clergy, or by some elected persons chosen by the representatives of the people, or by some persons directly elected by the people under some special conditions for being eligible, if we refer to the 17th amendment to the U.S.(A.) constitution added in 1913 and refer to the article 1, section 3 of the same constitution.

A bit more about my work

Here is the conclusion of a study I have done about the “Discourse of the method” by Descartes, which can be useful in order to understand my work:

In order to conclude, I have to specify that the Cartesian logic, being applied among others to mathematics and physics/chemistry, we can find in the education by which we are abided some murky logics which could easily make us call all what we have learned in question, as the complex numbers which have a quite unusual consideration of the square root relatively to the negative numbers ; as well to consider electron as negative energy seems quite heretical because God (about God in science see the link at the beginning of the last post) is according with existence and it is not really possible to admit that something is present after nothingness. Nonetheless by a good reflection these notions can be enlightened. But moreover though the notion of lack is a fact, the concept of the negative energy and the anti-particles seems to me anyway quite doubtful (even if not so much heretical), and the system of the Cartesian gravity which follows the logic of the flame which is going up seems to me at least as neat, knowing on the top of that, that the theory of the skies is well confirmed by observing the rings of Saturn and that the motion in whirl, dear to Descartes, looks like the one drawn by the arms of galaxies. The relative void can be supposed. But if we want to put it at the center of attraction, why for instance could it not fill by volcanoes after they have spit? Because in this case there is not apparently any anti-return valve like in the blood vessels. And even if this could be possible the value of the attraction should decrease because the vacuum should tend to be filled through time. Furthermore the theory defended by Descartes, of which he did discuss with Blaise Pascal, about mercury(1) , has been confirmed by the work of Mr. Torricelli, a pupil of Galileo Galilei, who has rejected the theory of void used by his master about the functioning of pumps, what did lead him to the concept of the atmospheric pressure ; and this is the induction of this result which supports well the rest of the author ‘s theory against the one of vacuum. Nevertheless, it is possible to notice in the Galileo Galilei’s letter to Fulgenzio Micanzio of the 19th of December 1634 that even him did possess another explanation than the one of vacuum. In order to go further, despite the irregularity of the gravimetric geoids, it is possible to add the fact that the atmosphere presents a high resistance and temperature at the periphery of some layers ; what is observed while the rockets are going out, and is not due to the density of the particles because otherwise they should go closer to the planet Earth, but here it seems that we are in the presence of particles like the ones of the second element described in “The World”, which are very light, and thus produce a pressure by following a rule close to the theorem of Archimedes, which applies here vertically from the bottom toward the top because the particles which are light are going toward the top contrary to the molecules of water which are going toward the bottom, and the force is not equal to the weight of moved fluid, but depends on its volume. Finally in order to sustain the fact that when there is an error somewhere the whole is not inevitably one (about the work of Descartes), we can notice that Aristotle as well was rejecting the absolute vacuum, what did not stop Descartes doing it (he was not following Aristotle).

(1) : See the letter to the father Mersenne of the 13th of December 1647.

Conclusion for my theories (not for the blog)

To read before :

http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/08/heisenberg-and-god.html


In order to conclude it is good to notice that the theory as an intellectual construction which for a part is not depending on some experiences and/or experiments makes look at the world in a different manner and thus motivates to develop some physical inventions which make evolve our way of life, by assuring us a power suitable for bringing us the peace as much as our theories are the best ones; according to what it is obviously better to search because it is not by waiting that some new ideas come to confront our five senses that we will be protected; it is better to go methodically so intelligently, and if possible without going too far from the common way of thinking, to the research of these ideas, which at the beginning will catalyze at least our interpretation; thus we can remark that the theory according to which the Sun is the center of our planetary system had been seriously considered by the mind of Aristarchus of Samos and even more certainly by the one of Copernicus, before the telescope could bring enough sensual proofs to the rest of the world by the intermediate of Galileo Galilei, according to what the sensual proof is not indispensable to the reality, even if it confirms this reality and that it is better not to take too much risks. The error remains true for the human thought but at least the ones that we have realized become as much marks in order to show us the way of the truth. Also in order to judge a work it is better to know it totally, after it is better to know how to make allowances and not to condemn the totality while only a part is wrong [1], what discourages to do any hypothesis, nevertheless it is mainly like this that the humanity is evolving, from this possibility to progress blindly toward the divine truths. Obviously this submits us to error, but it is better to do some and to progress than not to do any and to remain farther from God, whereas we want to know It the most possible, as is confirming the worships which have been developed in the different civilizations and as well tribes; on the top of that to include this infinite consideration in our projects clings us stronger to life, and reinforces even our familial and social projects, because to have the ambition to know what is not finishing and is reinforcing us always, motivates us to progress directly or out of the intermediate of some others more qualified in order to discover things, and to whom it is better to give the opportunity to think in the best conditions possible.

[1] Update 04/08/2011: For the scientific part of my work, what is present should be enough for the time being, and until now the corrections are the effect of my own judgment, my work did then resist critics.

Article 10

Water stems from the equilibrium of the energetic potential of stars which forms the different atoms and molecules, and in a usual way we can remark its gaseous condensable release during some combustions and mainly the one stemmed from volcanoes. Also if we can observe its presence on the Earth it is due to the atmosphere, and to the gravity and the inertia which are in it and which retain water; thus it is possible to find it in three different forms which are vapor (clouds…), liquid (rains, lacks, rivers, seas…), and ice (snow, hail, ice-floe…). About the liquid streams they have in part the same causes than winds applied to the liquid element and can be influenced by them, also tidal waves stem from volcanic activities and from the displacements of plates, where there is some thermal phenomenons but as well wave ones(1); and the variations of relief have to be considered for the fluvial flows.
Otherwise we can think that the motion in tides should come from an interaction between the terrestrial sky and the one of the Moon, as a result of what for a first hypothesis we could pose (within the framework of the hypothesis of Descartes about this subject (see The World))…

The rest of this article has been modified and will not be published here, in order to protect it. (If you want to read it, see here: 

https://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2022/07/you-can-read-it-like-book-good-for-mind.html  )

(1): Also some enough powerful hurricanes can be accompanied by a groundswell of a considerable height.

Article 9 last part

But there is something left to explain in order this should be really logical, because at a same altitude in the closest layer to the soil the gravity is increasing by going from the equator toward the North Pole, although this is not the same thing by going toward the South Pole (there are more irregularities); as well it can seem strange that the gravity decreases when the altitude increases in this same layer, while the heaviest gases, as the CO2, which are then the closest to the soil have a greater capacity to carry as the liquid water compared with air, what should propose the opposite phenomenon (if we refer to the conditions of the experiment of von Jolly). Thus a new factor should be considered which is the composition of the soil, and here we can consider a black matter having an attractive power, which is magnetite or the mineral magnet, and which as its name indicates forms a magnetic field(1) by creating a flow with the particles of the two first secondary elements and especially the smallest ones; also the flow that they should form in this case should be quite weak what is proved by compasses, and should not create appreciably any warmth because especially the small particles of the second secondary element should participate in it(2), but it should increase all the same the quantity of the particles serving to the gravity in the geographical areas where should be found some magnetite with a higher concentration, by considering that it is possible to find a little of it everywhere in the crust(3); what should explain its variations at the level of the soil.
Besides this system of gravity should be propitious to explain the phenomenon of Northern Lights, because when the concentration of the particles of the first secondary element should be high enough(2), it should be normal that some luminous phenomenons should be produced; what should happen more easily near the magnetic North Pole for the reason that these particles should be more concentrated because of the magnetic field (more magnetite which orientates the magnetic field in some other places)(1).

(1): As well the motion under the terrestrial crust of the mass in fusion could produce a current being able to participate in the magnetic field (see theory of the dynamo effect). \ (2): See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/article-2.html \ (3): Considering that there is always a possible production of magnetite under the crust.

Update 13/04/2011: Otherwise about the particles as those of a magnetic field in the process of gravity, it is possible to consult the case of the mouse in magnetic levitation with a study of the NASA in relation with gravity (or of the frog by A. Geim (Nobel prize laureate) et M. Berry), here the magnetic field is enough higher than the radiation of the Earth (which is not local), but as well than the gravity, what gives the effect of a local thrust on a living being done by some particles of the same type as those considered here for gravity, what is close to the optical tweezers relatively to small things (see end of the article 6 about magnet). Lastly the particles considered here for the general magnetic field of the Earth come from a quite weak magnetic field and should intervene by the dispersion of the particles participating in the magnetic field (being free for the participation in the gravity), and possibly by thrust, this rather at the poles, because the magnetic field is vertical at the poles (so thrust toward the top or the bottom in the field).

  Lastly for the credibility of black holes, it is possible to read this: http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101214/full/468876a.html 

 

Update 06/01/12:

  About the Cavendish experiment, it is done with some masses of lead; but considering my theory for magnet (see article 6), it is better to not omit the emissions of atoms and the organization of it, thus even if lead is not reacting like iron to the emission of the flow of a magnet, the organization of its own one, is not going against the fact that it can have an interaction which is particular, with a different correspondence between the pores (see article 7). Thus the interaction between the spheres of lead should not be the result of the attraction coming from the universal gravitation, but of a particular force field (which is not bizarre).

Update 23/03/12: No string balls and still no black holes produced by the LHC, according to the results of 2011 (which is not good for the current theory of gravity). See this publication: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.6396.pdf

Update 18/03/13: Searches for large extra dimensions, gravitons, microscopic black holes, long-lived particles, dark matter, and leptoquarks are presented in the report at the following address. No sign of these new physics phenomena has been observed so far.

  Also I want to make notice that my work is not concerned with what is considered in this report (currently everything is going well for it), for example about the Long-Lived Neutral Particles and it is possible to check it if you want by following the references in this document.

Report: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1500560?ln=en

   Otherwise there is also a publication about the lack of production of string balls and black holes at the LHC, following the data of 2012 and with a better sensitivity than in 2011. See this document: http://cds.cern.ch/record/1460444?ln=en

Article 9 second part

As well gravity is especially remarkable in the layer of inertia the closest to the Earth, what could be due to the fact that the rupture between this layer and the following one should be greater than between the others out of a greater variation of the angular velocity, what should form a higher resistance to the displacement of some particles (see last posts). Thus considering the different ruptures so the different resistances it is normal that there is an impression of a relative weightlessness in some layers between the Earth and the Moon; what should be accentuated by the fact that more the energetic concentration forming the primary particles is low more the degree of fractality is high (1), then less the particles resist to a displacement, in the same manner than when the viscosity is lesser in the usual fluids.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html

Article 9 first part

Gravity should not be without an energetic equilibrium, as well it is considered to have a constant force following a same gravimetric geoid, and posing that all equilibrium is limited in time except with a divine and absolute consideration, this implies that it should be maintained; therefore if I am not mistaken it is not good to think that the force could exist without any movement and that it could thus produce a variable quantity of it (4). So in order to explain gravity in a rational manner, we could suppose that it should be maintained by some flows of some particles of the two first secondary elements(1) and especially of some malleable ones and of some of the smallest ones in cycle which do not produce any warmth in a considerable manner(2), which should be applied in an almost homogeneous manner at the surface of an object, while they should penetrate also its inside by almost all the pores, what should reduce the importance of the mass and of the surface if it is possible to neglect the resistance of air; to our knowledge these flows have two principal and constant sources of particles, which are the light of the Sun and the radiation of the Earth. As well light could all the same penetrate the atmosphere despite the resistance at the rupture between two layers (see atmosphere in the article 8, if you want to read it, see here: https://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2022/07/you-can-read-it-like-book-good-for-mind.html ) because it arrives in sufficiently dense and fast flows, nevertheless it should be this same resistance which should do that these particles could push on us, because when they should be in a concentration less dense than in the light, despite their velocity they should meet a resistance which should make them have a spinning motion or in circle being able to be developed in a helicoidal manner, and make them form some winds by a massive reorientation, but as well push the denser objects toward the bottom(3) out of the intermediate of the smallest cyclic secondary particles; this thrust should be formed because the very fast motion of the malleable particles and their size which lets them pass almost everywhere make them more suitable for going in the superior layers (see atmosphere). Thus the particles which should form this gravity should be at the basis the primary particles or malleable ones obtained by fractalization, which are endowed with an autonomous and very fast movement (2); and particularly the ones which are at the level of the body and should be on the way, following their progress toward the top and not the bottom, to take its place, next to pass above it with transmitting the motion especially out of the smallest cyclic particles; besides the flow already oriented of the particles toward the possibility to escape by the top orients easily the ones which are entering and diluting in the layer where it acts, knowing as stated previously that this flow is supplied with some particles out of a flow coming from under the soil out of the radiation of the Earth, and which periodically is reinforced by the particles coming from the Sun which are stopped at the level of the soil and by the clouds partly and have in the same manner a facility to tend toward the top, while they maintain a constant concentration in certain limits because the atmospheric resistance is not impossible to penetrate, also this resistance acts a little as a valve which should be more or less opened according to the pressure.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html
(2) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/article-2.html
(3) : Light (except laser) should not oppose any considerable resistance to the bodies which can be detected by our senses because in order to act thus on these bodies it should pass by the intermediate of the other particles of the atmosphere which oppose a higher resistance and of which it should determine the trajectory in its direction without dispersing them; thus the action for conducting motion should depend as for warmth on the particles mixed with a flow of some malleable particles, because it should be especially the smallest cyclic particles, which do not produce any warmth in a considerable manner, which should be effective in order to transmit motion because they react normally better; but these particles should be in a higher concentration in the atmosphere than in light, out of the space (between them) that the concentration of the malleable particles implies, according to what the motion of the malleable particles should be better conducted by the atmosphere thus composed than by light, and when light is mixing with it, it is possible to suppose the presence of some beams of light, what at least the presence of some atoms make unavoidable out of their resistance in some masses to the luminous flow. About laser, the action is especially thermal, what is possible according to the proportion between the malleable particles and thermal ones (mixing forced at the basis), and even if the concentration of particles producing warmth need not to be very high in order to make it perceptible, the production of a relatively weak motion is possible out of their action. Lastly for the fission of an atom, the malleable particles being so much concentrated in an atom that at the moment of the phenomenon they should be deployed in a bowl, which for being diluted should not have any other possibility than to drive at its front all the most suitable particles in order to transmit motion and the others, because they could not avoid them considering the absence of any beam at the basis and their very high density.

(4) : Update 13/04/2011: See about Newton:       http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2010/09/criticism-of-gravity-by-newton.html

Article 7

The magnetic field as a specific force field to magnet is drawn around it in its usual shape, in parallelepiped, in a particular manner, which is in butterfly; what could be explained according to the theory previously developed (see article 6,  if you want to read it, see here: https://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2022/07/you-can-read-it-like-book-good-for-mind.html ) by the fact that magnet following a geometrical and homogeneous formation, as for usual crystals, should develop a set of homogeneous and geometrical motions. Thus in the case of magnet according to an axis of distribution the pores located on a side should have an attractive power stemming from the depression formed by the accompaniment of the internal movement in cyclone, which should drive the surrounding particles of the two first secondary elements (1), and on the other side should have an expulsive power stemming from the pressure formed by the cyclonic leaving motion. But out of equilibrium the leaving cyclones should be complementary of the cyclonic inlets, thus it should be normal that at the level of the considered axis of distribution, should be shaped with the greatest simplicity some bridges between the cyclonic pores of inlet and of outlet, next for the formation of some bridges between farther pores, this should be done by a logical concatenation, because on a side of the leaving or entering cyclone should be a free space stemming from the curving in bridge of the cyclone of the same type at this place, and on the other should be the resistance and even the pressure formed by an unlinked cyclone of the same type, knowing that there should not be any fusion between the cyclones on the same side of the mentioned axis because they should have the same direction of rotation and thus push back themselves; according to what the one considered should be pushed alongside the bridge formed previously, thus should be curved and should form on its turn a bridge by finding on its way a complementary cyclone, but farther the pores should be, weaker the strength of the bridge should be because of the dispersion of the cyclonic motion. Lastly logically it should come that the fact to be complementary or the resistance between two poles of some different magnets should stem from the type of cyclone met, leaving or entering; also it should be considered that the contact between two magnets implies, relatively to the whole of both, that the cyclones should have a denser movement than before the contact, out of a highest concentration of particles following the trajectory which should be offered to them out of resisting to their straight motion, particles which should go through a longer distance before to have the liberty of a straighter way, what the experiment checks.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html

Article 5

Piezo electricity should come from the fact that the flows, stemmed from the decomposition of the equilibriums of a molecular assembly in crystals, should be distributed according to a network which subjected to a pressure should concentrate them in a manner which should make them electric; what the constraint sustained by the atoms could increase relatively to the emission of the nucleus.

Article 4

The non-artificial radioactivity concerns the heavy atoms, and considering a high density, which should contain more moving particles or/and some particles having a degree of fractality lesser(1), what should implies that by the deterioration of the equilibriums which are composing them, they could emit some very strong and penetrating flows of radiations.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html

For the last post

In relation with the last post it is possible to read : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/science-and-quantum-mechanics.html

Article 3 first part

In order to define the chemical reactions following the system described in the previous posts it is possible to consider that the equilibrium between the malleable particles(1) gives the luminous flows, that the one between the particles of the two first secondary elements gives some flows as warmth, and electricity; that the equilibrium between those particles in a high density gives atoms; after that the resistances of the equilibriums (without considering how they are) between some different atoms permit their unions, where the preference of the bond is done relatively to the intensity of the resistance which produces the union, intensity which is possible to estimate (in some similar conditions); without forgetting that some weak interactions can occur in addition of the strong ones as the hydrogenated bonds between the molecules of water. About disunion it is caused according to the presence of the particles of the two first secondary elements which out of concentration can form a compensatory resistance, according to some other actions which put some space between two atoms, and according to the ages of atoms implying the dissipation of the equilibrium which is forming them; these principles being able to be induced to the actions between molecules, so between the chains of atoms. Thus it seems possible to be able to explain and symbolize the quantities of energy used during a reaction.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html

The best part is coming, it is my new model for the structure of atom. (It has been removed because of plagiarism, so in order to read it, see here: 

https://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2022/07/you-can-read-it-like-book-good-for-mind.html )

Science and quantum mechanics

Heisenberg : “ May be should it be possible to divide indefinitely matter, except that at the end it should not be really a division, but a transformation of energy into matter…” (See the part : “Discussion about language”)

For the structure of atom relatively to the one I will propose (Serge l’Eternel) :
Heisenberg : “Now, if a trajectory of electron does exist in a Wilson chamber, there must be one as well in atom. But I confess to already have had some doubts about it. Because if it is true that we calculate an electronic orbit following the classic Newtonian mechanics, we confer to it afterwards, with the help of the quantum conditions, a stability that it should never have in accordance with this same Newtonian mechanics ; and when the electron jumps (in the case of the emission of radiation) from an orbit to the other, we prefer to say nothing about this jump : is it a broad jump, a high jump or what else ? So in a certain sense, all the idea that we construct about the orbit of an electron inside atom has to be absurd. But then, what? (See the part : “The notion of “understand” in physics”)
Wolfgang (Pauli) approved. “All this is really extremely mysterious. If an orbit of electron does exist in atom, electron must obviously turn on this orbit in a periodic way, with a determined frequency. In that case, the laws of electrodynamics impose that the electrical oscillations come from the charge doing this periodic motion. In other words, some light has to be radiated with the same frequency. But in reality, this is not like this at all : the frequency of oscillation of the radiated light is in fact between the frequency of orbit which precedes the famous so mysterious jump and the one which follows. All this is basically pure madness.” (See the part : “The notion of “understand” in physics”)
Wolfgang : “…; with regard to both of us, honestly, we do even not believe in the electronic orbits…” (See the same part)
Heisenberg : “…Bohr must know, him also, that he begins with some hypotheses which contain some contradictions, which can not be right therefore in the considered form…” (See the same part)
Niels Bohr, Nobel Prize laureate in physics, and creator of the actual pattern for atom : “By stability, I mean that this is always the same substances, with the same properties, which appear…This is incomprehensible following the classic mechanics, especially if we admit that atom looks like a planetary system.” (See the same part)
He adds a bit further : “These images (of atoms), answered Bohr, have been deducted or rather if you prefer, “guessed” from experimental facts ; they are not the fruit of some sort of theoretical calculations. I Hope that these images describe the structure of atoms as good (but only as good) as possible in the visual language of the classic physics…”
Heisenberg : “But how will it be possible, in these conditions, to do some progresses? When all is said and done, has not it, physics, to be an exact science?” (See the same part)
“We must expect, said Bohr, that the paradoxes of the quantum theory, the incomprehensible aspects linked to the stability of matter, are going to be lighted in an always more distinct manner with every new experimental fact. If this is thus, we can hope that with time some new concepts will be formed, and that these new concepts will allow us to seize in a certain way even the not visual processes occurring in atom. But from that we are still very far.” (See the same part)

(From the same book as the previous post)

Article 2

Light logically should stem from the concentration of the malleable particles moving(1) themselves together or rather of their type if we consider the degree of fractality(2), and it can be accompanied by more or less warmth according to the quantity and the size of the sufficiently free particles of the second secondary element that it takes with(3) ; on the top of that for the luminous displacement we have better to remind that the primary or malleable particles directly obtained by the fractalization of Energy possess an autonomous and very fast movement out of the energetic attributes((2) and the posts of the same set), as well at a sufficient concentration of energy in a same direction, they can drive the particles formed by some cycles of these same primary particles, according to what they are at the foundation of all movements (in the case of light, see article 9 to come). Otherwise we could think that, out of the influence of the majority movement depending on the distribution of the energetic mass so on the shape, the movement in the malleable particle could orientate itself in a homogeneous manner.
But for our senses light possesses some different direct sources which can be some chemical reactions, as combustion, as well the one produces by fireflies, and the one corresponding to the nuclear fusions or the nuclear explosions ; but can also be electroluminescence produced for example by lightning. Besides we can notice that the luminous presence proves well here (in this system) that the energy is the same for electrons with electroluminescence during which they cohabit in a high concentration with light, and in nucleus with the light and not its absorption obtained with its opening. On the top of that, as it has been remarked in the previous article negativity can be accepted as it represents a lack, but it should unavoidably try to compensate itself, what is not observed here. Also if the search for absorption could be a present phenomenon for each peace of matter and proportional to its density, why to the planetary scale the biggest parts should be more easily attracted between them? Whereas thus they should cause to themselves more interaction as the identical parts of magnets, and then leave between them the small less dense particles, so of an inferior attraction; nevertheless flame goes up and there is not any space between a stone and the soil, at rest.
1: Colors could come from some different degrees of concentration. \ 2: See http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html \ 3: See http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html

Water, lightning and living organisms

Water stems from the equilibrium of the energetic potential of stars which forms the different atoms and molecules; but in a usual manner we can observe its gaseous condensable emission during some combustions and mainly the one stemmed from volcanoes. As well if we can observe its presence on the Earth it is due to the inertia of the atmosphere which prevents from its dissipation in the space following the spinning movement of the Earth; thus it is possible to find it in three different forms which are vapor (clouds...), liquid (rains, lakes, rivers, seas...), and ice (snow, hail, ice-floe...). About the liquid streams they have in part the same causes as the considered winds (see last post) applied to the liquid element and can be influenced by them, as well tidal waves come from volcanic activities and the displacements of plates, where there is wave phenomenons but as well thermal(1) ones; and it has to be considered the variations of relief for the fluvial flows.
1: Also some enough powerful hurricanes can be accompanied by a groundswell of a considerable height.

Lightning is stemmed from the formation of some concentrated flows of particles, which are the ones of the two first secondary elements (see the beginning of the presentation of the elements), in which are some of those forming light; these flows are called electric currents, here they are formed in air where they make their way through moisture. For this it has to be enough particles in order to form these flows, to what warmth can contribute, after it has to be atmosphere which can retain water which forms clouds and moisture, which catalyze the currents of particles in order to make them electric.

Lastly living organisms are not without light, warmth, the different mineral and organic components which form soil, as well air so atmosphere, and lastly water. On the top of that it is possible to specify that a lot of animals are not without plants which assure the presence of oxygen, and these, if we use a microscope, without the unicellular microorganisms as protists, which are stemmed from the formation of DNA out of the elements which have just been quoted.

Stars, atmosphere, gravity and winds

Stars are not without the energetic concentration which had created them, thus we obtain among others the Sun, the Earth, the Moon, and comets.

Atmosphere is not without an energetic phenomenon which permits the formation of some layers more or less resistant to the exchanges of particles and for our senses without the formation of gases which is coming from the volcanic activity or some other phenomenons related to the mass in fusion as breaks.

Gravity is not without the energetic phenomenon which acts in the formation of atmosphere and sorts out bodies according to their density.

The winds of surface are not in a remarkable way without some changes of pressure which can come from the variations of warmth due to the regulation of our atmosphere, to our location relatively to the Sun, then to the equilibrium of the movements of stars and the activity of the sources of warmth. For example this produces phenomenons as cyclones and trade-winds. But wind depends as well on the emission of gas brings by combustion and fermentation, without forgetting explosions which emit suddenly some gas or/and some energetic particles.

Warmth

Warmth following the logic of this system should occur at the basis out of the movement of the secondary particles inferior to atom, and the contact that they produce, then in the sensible manner out of the biggest of the second secondary element taken with the ones of the first (see the two last posts), thus light should produce more or less warmth according to the quantity and the size of the particles sufficiently free of the second secondary element that it carries ; but to the scale of our senses it has as its main sources the exothermic reactions as combustion (volcanoes and fires) and fermentation (soil), but as well shocks (stars and other solids), frictions ( the movements of the continental plates, stars, and other solids), the compression or concentration of energy (the centers of whirls, the layer of the high atmosphere or thermosphere) and radioactivity (chain reaction in the Sun or the center of some stars, and some ores coming from the soil).