Article 7

The magnetic field as a specific force field to magnet is drawn around it in its usual shape, in parallelepiped, in a particular manner, which is in butterfly; what could be explained according to the theory previously developed (see article 6,  if you want to read it, see here: https://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2022/07/you-can-read-it-like-book-good-for-mind.html ) by the fact that magnet following a geometrical and homogeneous formation, as for usual crystals, should develop a set of homogeneous and geometrical motions. Thus in the case of magnet according to an axis of distribution the pores located on a side should have an attractive power stemming from the depression formed by the accompaniment of the internal movement in cyclone, which should drive the surrounding particles of the two first secondary elements (1), and on the other side should have an expulsive power stemming from the pressure formed by the cyclonic leaving motion. But out of equilibrium the leaving cyclones should be complementary of the cyclonic inlets, thus it should be normal that at the level of the considered axis of distribution, should be shaped with the greatest simplicity some bridges between the cyclonic pores of inlet and of outlet, next for the formation of some bridges between farther pores, this should be done by a logical concatenation, because on a side of the leaving or entering cyclone should be a free space stemming from the curving in bridge of the cyclone of the same type at this place, and on the other should be the resistance and even the pressure formed by an unlinked cyclone of the same type, knowing that there should not be any fusion between the cyclones on the same side of the mentioned axis because they should have the same direction of rotation and thus push back themselves; according to what the one considered should be pushed alongside the bridge formed previously, thus should be curved and should form on its turn a bridge by finding on its way a complementary cyclone, but farther the pores should be, weaker the strength of the bridge should be because of the dispersion of the cyclonic motion. Lastly logically it should come that the fact to be complementary or the resistance between two poles of some different magnets should stem from the type of cyclone met, leaving or entering; also it should be considered that the contact between two magnets implies, relatively to the whole of both, that the cyclones should have a denser movement than before the contact, out of a highest concentration of particles following the trajectory which should be offered to them out of resisting to their straight motion, particles which should go through a longer distance before to have the liberty of a straighter way, what the experiment checks.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html

Article 5

Piezo electricity should come from the fact that the flows, stemmed from the decomposition of the equilibriums of a molecular assembly in crystals, should be distributed according to a network which subjected to a pressure should concentrate them in a manner which should make them electric; what the constraint sustained by the atoms could increase relatively to the emission of the nucleus.

Article 4

The non-artificial radioactivity concerns the heavy atoms, and considering a high density, which should contain more moving particles or/and some particles having a degree of fractality lesser(1), what should implies that by the deterioration of the equilibriums which are composing them, they could emit some very strong and penetrating flows of radiations.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html

For the last post

In relation with the last post it is possible to read : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/science-and-quantum-mechanics.html

Article 3 first part

In order to define the chemical reactions following the system described in the previous posts it is possible to consider that the equilibrium between the malleable particles(1) gives the luminous flows, that the one between the particles of the two first secondary elements gives some flows as warmth, and electricity; that the equilibrium between those particles in a high density gives atoms; after that the resistances of the equilibriums (without considering how they are) between some different atoms permit their unions, where the preference of the bond is done relatively to the intensity of the resistance which produces the union, intensity which is possible to estimate (in some similar conditions); without forgetting that some weak interactions can occur in addition of the strong ones as the hydrogenated bonds between the molecules of water. About disunion it is caused according to the presence of the particles of the two first secondary elements which out of concentration can form a compensatory resistance, according to some other actions which put some space between two atoms, and according to the ages of atoms implying the dissipation of the equilibrium which is forming them; these principles being able to be induced to the actions between molecules, so between the chains of atoms. Thus it seems possible to be able to explain and symbolize the quantities of energy used during a reaction.

(1) : See : http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html

The best part is coming, it is my new model for the structure of atom. (It has been removed because of plagiarism, so in order to read it, see here: 

https://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2022/07/you-can-read-it-like-book-good-for-mind.html )

Science and quantum mechanics

Heisenberg : “ May be should it be possible to divide indefinitely matter, except that at the end it should not be really a division, but a transformation of energy into matter…” (See the part : “Discussion about language”)

For the structure of atom relatively to the one I will propose (Serge l’Eternel) :
Heisenberg : “Now, if a trajectory of electron does exist in a Wilson chamber, there must be one as well in atom. But I confess to already have had some doubts about it. Because if it is true that we calculate an electronic orbit following the classic Newtonian mechanics, we confer to it afterwards, with the help of the quantum conditions, a stability that it should never have in accordance with this same Newtonian mechanics ; and when the electron jumps (in the case of the emission of radiation) from an orbit to the other, we prefer to say nothing about this jump : is it a broad jump, a high jump or what else ? So in a certain sense, all the idea that we construct about the orbit of an electron inside atom has to be absurd. But then, what? (See the part : “The notion of “understand” in physics”)
Wolfgang (Pauli) approved. “All this is really extremely mysterious. If an orbit of electron does exist in atom, electron must obviously turn on this orbit in a periodic way, with a determined frequency. In that case, the laws of electrodynamics impose that the electrical oscillations come from the charge doing this periodic motion. In other words, some light has to be radiated with the same frequency. But in reality, this is not like this at all : the frequency of oscillation of the radiated light is in fact between the frequency of orbit which precedes the famous so mysterious jump and the one which follows. All this is basically pure madness.” (See the part : “The notion of “understand” in physics”)
Wolfgang : “…; with regard to both of us, honestly, we do even not believe in the electronic orbits…” (See the same part)
Heisenberg : “…Bohr must know, him also, that he begins with some hypotheses which contain some contradictions, which can not be right therefore in the considered form…” (See the same part)
Niels Bohr, Nobel Prize laureate in physics, and creator of the actual pattern for atom : “By stability, I mean that this is always the same substances, with the same properties, which appear…This is incomprehensible following the classic mechanics, especially if we admit that atom looks like a planetary system.” (See the same part)
He adds a bit further : “These images (of atoms), answered Bohr, have been deducted or rather if you prefer, “guessed” from experimental facts ; they are not the fruit of some sort of theoretical calculations. I Hope that these images describe the structure of atoms as good (but only as good) as possible in the visual language of the classic physics…”
Heisenberg : “But how will it be possible, in these conditions, to do some progresses? When all is said and done, has not it, physics, to be an exact science?” (See the same part)
“We must expect, said Bohr, that the paradoxes of the quantum theory, the incomprehensible aspects linked to the stability of matter, are going to be lighted in an always more distinct manner with every new experimental fact. If this is thus, we can hope that with time some new concepts will be formed, and that these new concepts will allow us to seize in a certain way even the not visual processes occurring in atom. But from that we are still very far.” (See the same part)

(From the same book as the previous post)

A bit of morality with Heisenberg

In “Physics and Beyond” of Werner Heisenberg (Nobel Prize laureate in physics), a book not only scientific but as well political, moral, and about philosophy and religion :

“…Nonetheless on a restriction basis, I have all the same to say that some rules exist which are effectively respected, though nobody does impose it. Thus, for example, we do not smoke and drink only rarely some alcohol…” (See the part : “A lesson of politics and history”)
Otherwise :
“The problem of values I said, this is the set of questions : what should we do? To what have we to aspire? How must we behave? The problem is then formulated by the human being and relatively to the human being ; this is the problem of the compass which has to orientate our way through life. This compass has received some very different names in the various religions and ideologies : “happiness”, “God’s willpower”, “the sense of life”, in order to quote just some of them…” (See the part : “Positivism, metaphysics and religion”)
As well about his relation with the Jews (without being one) when he did neither seem Marxist nor against workers :
“…About the anti-Semitism preached by Hitler, this is for me as well one of the most unpleasant aspects of the movement…” (See the part : “Revolution and university life”)
“…Our compatriots will understand, I hope fast enough, that we can not participate any more to the modern life without an efficient research ; they will may be acknowledge, especially relatively to the atomic physics, that the disdain shown toward the fundamental research by the actual national-socialist régime has contributed to the actual catastrophe or at least has constituted a symptom of it.” (See the part : “The way of the new start”)
What does sustain the theory following which Hitler was the false friend of the great innovators, which do not let dupe themselves and drive like this.
Finally we can read that the scientific thinkers are not some mad persons :
“…It is told that, when the first scientific society has been set up, they did take as a task to fight against the superstitions by refuting by some experiences the affirmations which were in the books of magic…” (See the part : “Positivism, metaphysics and religion”)