Article 2

Light logically should stem from the concentration of the malleable particles moving(1) themselves together or rather of their type if we consider the degree of fractality(2), and it can be accompanied by more or less warmth according to the quantity and the size of the sufficiently free particles of the second secondary element that it takes with(3) ; on the top of that for the luminous displacement we have better to remind that the primary or malleable particles directly obtained by the fractalization of Energy possess an autonomous and very fast movement out of the energetic attributes((2) and the posts of the same set), as well at a sufficient concentration of energy in a same direction, they can drive the particles formed by some cycles of these same primary particles, according to what they are at the foundation of all movements (in the case of light, see article 9 to come). Otherwise we could think that, out of the influence of the majority movement depending on the distribution of the energetic mass so on the shape, the movement in the malleable particle could orientate itself in a homogeneous manner.
But for our senses light possesses some different direct sources which can be some chemical reactions, as combustion, as well the one produces by fireflies, and the one corresponding to the nuclear fusions or the nuclear explosions ; but can also be electroluminescence produced for example by lightning. Besides we can notice that the luminous presence proves well here (in this system) that the energy is the same for electrons with electroluminescence during which they cohabit in a high concentration with light, and in nucleus with the light and not its absorption obtained with its opening. On the top of that, as it has been remarked in the previous article negativity can be accepted as it represents a lack, but it should unavoidably try to compensate itself, what is not observed here. Also if the search for absorption could be a present phenomenon for each peace of matter and proportional to its density, why to the planetary scale the biggest parts should be more easily attracted between them? Whereas thus they should cause to themselves more interaction as the identical parts of magnets, and then leave between them the small less dense particles, so of an inferior attraction; nevertheless flame goes up and there is not any space between a stone and the soil, at rest.
1: Colors could come from some different degrees of concentration. \ 2: See http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/6.html \ 3: See http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/09/god-and-elements-which-compose-it.html

Article 1

About the absolute vacuum we can mathematically consider that it represents nothingness so zero, what seems difficult to obtain with an absolute consideration, because from nothing nobody can produce anything so some space, for the reason that when there is an absolute vacuum between two sides they are sticking together; following what it should be even more difficult to obtain less than the absolute vacuum. Thus as it is better to consider what can exist than what cannot, zero can only be relative and the mathematical negativity only give utterance to a lack; nevertheless this is not a problem to consider geometrically the square root of a lack, what implies that the one of a negative number should in this case be rational, what is approached by the complex numbers where the missing part can be considered as imaginary and the present one as real; but in order to realize fully the consideration it should be noticed(1) square root of -1 = -1, because generally "i" is used for symbolizing the imaginary set but the negative sign should be enough.

(1) : Considering that a square missing surface can be the product of two missing sides, knowing that if only one has been present the surface should as well be missing, but there should be two roots for example 1 cm and -1 cm, one present and one missing ; as well the problem has to be well relativized because if the negative sign occurs as a relation then : -1(object) * -1 = 1(object), or may be better : - * 1(object) * - = 1(object), because the lack of a lack is a presence and the reject of this one is the multiplication by 0, so the relative non-being.

Conclusion before more sciences (included gravity)

Heisenberg and God :
To read before :http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/08/heisenberg-and-god.html

In order to stay in the same frame of mind, with the memory of the exodus toward the regions of the western Europe of the learned Greeks and philosophic unpublished works after the capture of Constantinople by the Turks, what makes this movement of thought at least a little our heritage, I recommend you in the reasonable limits the philosophy which considers God from Socrates by way of René Descartes, because all of this although being able to differ about some different opinions, and depending on some truths that we can find in us perpetually, testifies as well to a continuity of the knowledge which is opened to us, and then to the will-power for the possession in us of a part always bigger of the divine eternity. As well it is good to honor the compatibility of some philosophies, because this is not a blemish supposing the copy, but an advantage permitting to participate in the running of the general thought out of continuity. The compatibility is an effort and not a facility, it supposes the mastery of the topic, but may be in some other words more personal, being anyway generally a part of the common sense to think; as well in order to be really useful, this effort has to bring some new ideas, actualizing the old ones at the same time. Lastly it is better to be lucid as Socrates, whose the philosophy is quite close, to the one limited as a religion, of Christianity, and which explains, in the 25th paragraph of the Plato’s Phaedrus, that in order to understand fully things, anybody should have a fully divine science; and thus even for a god, it is only possible to give an approximate idea, with satisfying himself out of a human science and its part of divinity. As well we have better to notice that this science with time tends with rigor logically to increase its part of truth, in order that we can be less approximate. Besides religion cannot permit to itself to preach some theories from the time in which they appear as scientific hypotheses, it has better to restrict itself the most as possible to certitudes, and then to stay in the field of the generalities capable of supporting moral.

About elements

Heisenberg and God :
To read before :
http://eternal-cartesian.blogspot.com/2009/08/heisenberg-and-god.html

The most important in a materialistic way can seem to be the spinning center, of some stars, of the solar system, of the galactic whirls..., and then the important energy that it contains; thus God’s concentration is important concerning our existence, knowing that it can as well destroy us through the intermediate of God’s tertiary elements. But before the existence of stars, we have to consider an equilibrium of the energy forming some cycles permitting to obtain atoms, this by producing some light at a sufficient concentration, after a bowl of energy where some intermediate cycles are made and some atoms, as the center of some stars, that is what seems to happen by the intermediate of the telescope in what is designated to us as a black hole, with on the top of that the absorption of some already existing matter, but the phenomenons implied in this are not yet very clear, although an equilibrium is surely present and in part in the shape of a whirl apparently. The important natural elements developed after are the chemical components which will give soil, which will be agitated by the central movement and the interaction of stars ; as well volcanoes and the movements of the continental plates out of the energetic potential of the center of stars, next the gaseous layers of the atmosphere which retain water and the winds of gas moved among others by the interactions of stars, and the emissions of warmth which can form the lightning; lastly the living organisms stemmed from the combination or the equilibrium of all of this, what makes them very dependent.



In a sketched way, we obtain:

Energy
+
The Asymmetric Fractalization, Movement, Resistance, and Equilibrium
=
The Malleable particles, Light, the intermediate Particles, Warmth, Atoms, Molecules, Matter, Stars and their energetic potential


+
The Asymmetric Fractalization, Movement, Resistance, and Equilibrium
=
The Flows of particles, Gases, Liquids/
Their movements being due to their own equilibrium and to the one of stars


+
The Asymmetric Fractalization, Movement, Resistance, and Equilibrium
=
The Living Organisms

Water, lightning and living organisms

Water stems from the equilibrium of the energetic potential of stars which forms the different atoms and molecules; but in a usual manner we can observe its gaseous condensable emission during some combustions and mainly the one stemmed from volcanoes. As well if we can observe its presence on the Earth it is due to the inertia of the atmosphere which prevents from its dissipation in the space following the spinning movement of the Earth; thus it is possible to find it in three different forms which are vapor (clouds...), liquid (rains, lakes, rivers, seas...), and ice (snow, hail, ice-floe...). About the liquid streams they have in part the same causes as the considered winds (see last post) applied to the liquid element and can be influenced by them, as well tidal waves come from volcanic activities and the displacements of plates, where there is wave phenomenons but as well thermal(1) ones; and it has to be considered the variations of relief for the fluvial flows.
1: Also some enough powerful hurricanes can be accompanied by a groundswell of a considerable height.

Lightning is stemmed from the formation of some concentrated flows of particles, which are the ones of the two first secondary elements (see the beginning of the presentation of the elements), in which are some of those forming light; these flows are called electric currents, here they are formed in air where they make their way through moisture. For this it has to be enough particles in order to form these flows, to what warmth can contribute, after it has to be atmosphere which can retain water which forms clouds and moisture, which catalyze the currents of particles in order to make them electric.

Lastly living organisms are not without light, warmth, the different mineral and organic components which form soil, as well air so atmosphere, and lastly water. On the top of that it is possible to specify that a lot of animals are not without plants which assure the presence of oxygen, and these, if we use a microscope, without the unicellular microorganisms as protists, which are stemmed from the formation of DNA out of the elements which have just been quoted.

Stars, atmosphere, gravity and winds

Stars are not without the energetic concentration which had created them, thus we obtain among others the Sun, the Earth, the Moon, and comets.

Atmosphere is not without an energetic phenomenon which permits the formation of some layers more or less resistant to the exchanges of particles and for our senses without the formation of gases which is coming from the volcanic activity or some other phenomenons related to the mass in fusion as breaks.

Gravity is not without the energetic phenomenon which acts in the formation of atmosphere and sorts out bodies according to their density.

The winds of surface are not in a remarkable way without some changes of pressure which can come from the variations of warmth due to the regulation of our atmosphere, to our location relatively to the Sun, then to the equilibrium of the movements of stars and the activity of the sources of warmth. For example this produces phenomenons as cyclones and trade-winds. But wind depends as well on the emission of gas brings by combustion and fermentation, without forgetting explosions which emit suddenly some gas or/and some energetic particles.

Warmth

Warmth following the logic of this system should occur at the basis out of the movement of the secondary particles inferior to atom, and the contact that they produce, then in the sensible manner out of the biggest of the second secondary element taken with the ones of the first (see the two last posts), thus light should produce more or less warmth according to the quantity and the size of the particles sufficiently free of the second secondary element that it carries ; but to the scale of our senses it has as its main sources the exothermic reactions as combustion (volcanoes and fires) and fermentation (soil), but as well shocks (stars and other solids), frictions ( the movements of the continental plates, stars, and other solids), the compression or concentration of energy (the centers of whirls, the layer of the high atmosphere or thermosphere) and radioactivity (chain reaction in the Sun or the center of some stars, and some ores coming from the soil).